I still can’t get my head around what is being asked for in these philosophy assignments. I thought I had it this time and whilst I’d improved my signposting apparently I was too vague and needed more argument. Back down to a 68 again. I think I’ll just have to accept that I’m not cut out to write philosophy essays in the way they want them written as I just can’t tell what that is. I was previously exhorted to include more “I” statements so did, but they’re too vague? They want more examples but I was already over the word count, so how can they be fitted in with everything else they also wanted (and liked)?. Oh well, two more essays until the exam to try and get a handle on it. At least my example of the OPERA experiment was received well.
A222 – TMA04 – result
Leave a reply